First-Party Research
BetLogic Prediction Research
A living report derived from BetLogic's own settled Main Tip record. It describes performance by market and competition, the separate public calibrated-confidence mapping, and recurring failure categories. It is descriptive research, not betting advice.
Research Snapshot
Updated through 10 November 2026
Baseline
18 May 2026
Latest complete month
October 2026
Display threshold
20 settled
Finding threshold
50 settled
Strong threshold
100 settled
Publication thresholds: 20 settled to display a cohort, 50 to state a finding, 100 for strong evidence.
Latest Complete Month — October 2026
Actual covered hit rate 68.9%
Actual hit rate · 45 covered
Market baseline 76.4% · -7.5 pts
32.6% coverage · 45/138 eligible 1X2 tips
Incomplete market sample: coverage is 60% or less.
Bookmaker Brier 0.2066 (lower is better)
BetLogic Brier unavailable — no canonical decision-time BetLogic probability is stored (P1.2).
ROI unavailable — decision-time decimal odds were not stored for this sample.
Strong evidence
1 October 2026 — 31 October 2026
90-Day Context
Actual covered hit rate 75.0%
Actual hit rate · 120 covered
Market baseline 75.1% · -0.1 pts
32.2% coverage · 120/373 eligible 1X2 tips
Incomplete market sample: coverage is 60% or less.
Bookmaker Brier 0.1734 (lower is better)
BetLogic Brier unavailable — no canonical decision-time BetLogic probability is stored (P1.2).
ROI unavailable — decision-time decimal odds were not stored for this sample.
Strong evidence
13 August 2026 — 10 November 2026
All-Time Context
Actual covered hit rate 75.0%
Actual hit rate · 120 covered
Market baseline 75.1% · -0.1 pts
32.2% coverage · 120/373 eligible 1X2 tips
Incomplete market sample: coverage is 60% or less.
Bookmaker Brier 0.1734 (lower is better)
BetLogic Brier unavailable — no canonical decision-time BetLogic probability is stored (P1.2).
ROI unavailable — decision-time decimal odds were not stored for this sample.
Strong evidence
18 May 2026 — 10 November 2026
Market Performance
Market cohorts with at least 20 settled predictions. Sample size and evidence tier are shown for every row, and no market is ranked as a better or safer choice than another.
October 2026
| Market | Landed | Missed | Void | Settled sample | Actual hit rate | Market baseline | Difference | Covered / eligible | Coverage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double Chance | 91 | 47 | 0 | 138 | 68.9% | 76.4% | -7.5 pts | 45/138 | 32.6% · incomplete | Strong evidence |
Last 90 days
| Market | Landed | Missed | Void | Settled sample | Actual hit rate | Market baseline | Difference | Covered / eligible | Coverage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double Chance | 270 | 103 | 0 | 373 | 75.0% | 75.1% | -0.1 pts | 120/373 | 32.2% · incomplete | Strong evidence |
All time
| Market | Landed | Missed | Void | Settled sample | Actual hit rate | Market baseline | Difference | Covered / eligible | Coverage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double Chance | 270 | 103 | 0 | 373 | 75.0% | 75.1% | -0.1 pts | 120/373 | 32.2% · incomplete | Strong evidence |
Competition Performance
Competition cohorts with at least 20 settled predictions. Competitions below that sample are not compared, because a handful of results cannot describe a pattern.
October 2026
| Competition | Landed | Missed | Void | Settled sample | Actual hit rate | Market baseline | Difference | Covered / eligible | Coverage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copa del ReySpain | 16 | 18 | 0 | 34 | — | — | — | 0/34 | 0.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Major League SoccerUSA | 14 | 8 | 0 | 22 | 55.6% | 77.0% | -21.4 pts | 9/22 | 40.9% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Last 90 days
| Competition | Landed | Missed | Void | Settled sample | Actual hit rate | Market baseline | Difference | Covered / eligible | Coverage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major League SoccerUSA | 35 | 9 | 0 | 44 | 73.7% | 75.6% | -1.9 pts | 19/44 | 43.2% · incomplete | Building evidence |
| FA CupEngland | 26 | 14 | 0 | 40 | — | — | — | 0/40 | 0.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
| Copa del ReySpain | 17 | 22 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | 0/39 | 0.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Serie AItaly | 22 | 8 | 0 | 30 | 68.8% | 77.4% | -8.6 pts | 16/30 | 53.3% · incomplete | Building evidence |
La LigaSpain | 19 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 100.0% | 76.1% | +23.9 pts | 8/20 | 40.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Premier LeagueEngland | 17 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 71.4% | 79.2% | -7.8 pts | 7/20 | 35.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Serie ABrazil | 17 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 100.0% | 72.5% | +27.5 pts | 7/20 | 35.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
All time
| Competition | Landed | Missed | Void | Settled sample | Actual hit rate | Market baseline | Difference | Covered / eligible | Coverage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major League SoccerUSA | 35 | 9 | 0 | 44 | 73.7% | 75.6% | -1.9 pts | 19/44 | 43.2% · incomplete | Building evidence |
| FA CupEngland | 26 | 14 | 0 | 40 | — | — | — | 0/40 | 0.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
| Copa del ReySpain | 17 | 22 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | 0/39 | 0.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Serie AItaly | 22 | 8 | 0 | 30 | 68.8% | 77.4% | -8.6 pts | 16/30 | 53.3% · incomplete | Building evidence |
La LigaSpain | 19 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 100.0% | 76.1% | +23.9 pts | 8/20 | 40.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Premier LeagueEngland | 17 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 71.4% | 79.2% | -7.8 pts | 7/20 | 35.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Serie ABrazil | 17 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 100.0% | 72.5% | +27.5 pts | 7/20 | 35.0% · incomplete | Building evidence |
Internal Score Calibration Evidence
This internal learning evidence compares raw score cohorts with their observed outcomes. It remains separate from P1.2's canonical public confidence projection and is not used as a public probability owner.
| Internal score cohort | Settled sample | Landed | Missed | Observed hit rate | Avg internal score | Calibration gap | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <60 | 116 | 91 | 25 | 78.4% | 56.5/100 | +22.0 pts | Underconfident |
| 60-65 | 199 | 137 | 62 | 68.8% | 62.2/100 | +6.7 pts | Underconfident |
| 65-70 | 280 | 210 | 70 | 75.0% | 67.1/100 | +7.9 pts | Underconfident |
| 70-75 | 572 | 387 | 185 | 67.7% | 71.9/100 | -4.3 pts | Overconfident |
| 75-80 | 419 | 309 | 110 | 73.7% | 76.9/100 | -3.2 pts | Overconfident |
| 80-85 | 567 | 427 | 140 | 75.3% | 82.1/100 | -6.7 pts | Overconfident |
| 85-90 | 306 | 215 | 91 | 70.3% | 86.7/100 | -16.5 pts | Overconfident |
| 90+ | 282 | 237 | 45 | 84.0% | 93.3/100 | -9.2 pts | Overconfident |
Public Calibrated Confidence
The public confidence owner uses only canonical settled Main Tips. It fits monotone broad-band rates with pool-adjacent-violators on the earlier chronological evidence, then checks the final held-out period. Exact confidence is shown only for a band with at least 100 training samples, 50 held-out samples and a held-out gap of 5 percentage points or less. Otherwise public surfaces show a band and historical landed rate, never a raw trust score.
Mapping
p1.2-settled-main-tip-pav-v1
Evidence window
2026-10-27 — 2026-11-10
Settled sample
373
Held-out sample
112
| Public band | Settled sample | Historical landed rate | Held-out sample | Held-out gap | Public output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low confidence | 373 | 72.4% | 112 | +3.7 pts | Exact calibrated confidence: 71.3% |
| Moderate confidence | 0 | — | 0 | — | Unavailable |
| High confidence | 0 | — | 0 | — | Unavailable |
Failure Patterns
Missed Main Tips are classified into a fixed, deterministic set of failure categories. Only aggregate counts of losses are published — no individual match, fixture or underlying evidence is exposed, and a win is never counted here even when it was, in hindsight, under-confident.
454 classified missed Main Tips from 1635 settled predictions examined, 13 August 2026 — 10 November 2026.
| Category | Count | Share of classified | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result went the other way | 383 | 84.4% | Strong evidence |
| Confidence overestimated | 46 | 10.1% | Building evidence |
What the Evidence Supports
Each statement below is generated from the tables above and is only produced when its own cohort reached at least 50 settled predictions.
- BetLogic Main Tips recorded 65.9% landed outcomes across 138 settled predictions in October 2026 (91 landed, 47 missed, 0 void).
- BetLogic Main Tips recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled predictions over the last 90 days (270 landed, 103 missed, 0 void).
- BetLogic Main Tips recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled predictions across the published record to date (270 landed, 103 missed, 0 void).
- Double Chance markets recorded 65.9% landed outcomes across 138 settled Main Tips in October 2026.
- Double Chance markets recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled Main Tips over the last 90 days.
- Double Chance markets recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled Main Tips across the published record to date.
- The 70-75 internal-score cohort was overconfident across 572 settled samples: observed hit rate was 67.7%, compared with an average internal score of 71.9/100.
- The 80-85 internal-score cohort was overconfident across 567 settled samples: observed hit rate was 75.3%, compared with an average internal score of 82.1/100.
- The 75-80 internal-score cohort was overconfident across 419 settled samples: observed hit rate was 73.7%, compared with an average internal score of 76.9/100.
- "Result went the other way" was the most frequently classified error category in this research window, appearing 383 times across 454 classified samples.
Limitations
- Sample thresholds (20 / 50 / 100 settled) control publication eligibility only. They are conservative product gates and do not claim formal statistical significance.
- This research is descriptive. It reports what settled results show and does not establish cause or skill.
- ROI is unavailable because BetLogic did not store verified decision-time decimal odds for this historical sample. It is never reconstructed from implied probability.
- BetLogic Brier remains unavailable: P1.2 publishes a qualified band-level calibration mapping, not a retrospective per-selection probability scorecard.
- Void, unresolved and unsupported predictions never enter the hit-rate denominator.
- Historical performance does not guarantee future results.
Methodology
Research evidence can inform future BetLogic methodology changes, but this report does not claim a public methodology change unless that change is separately documented in the public Prediction Methodology. Internal prediction rules, configuration and reasoning traces are not published.
Underlying Data
Performance, market and competition figures on this page are derived from BetLogic's published settled Main Tip record. The Prediction Dataset contains the machine-readable settled predictions, and Prediction Performance shows the same canonical record as headline windows and breakdowns.
Calibration and failure-pattern research uses deterministic internal learning evidence from settled predictions. Only aggregate, public-safe results are published; internal rules, traces and per-match evidence remain private.




