Skip to main content

First-Party Research

BetLogic Prediction Research

A living report derived from BetLogic's own settled Main Tip record. It describes performance by market and competition, the separate public calibrated-confidence mapping, and recurring failure categories. It is descriptive research, not betting advice.

Research Snapshot

Updated through 10 November 2026

Baseline

18 May 2026

Latest complete month

October 2026

Display threshold

20 settled

Finding threshold

50 settled

Strong threshold

100 settled

Publication thresholds: 20 settled to display a cohort, 50 to state a finding, 100 for strong evidence.

Latest Complete Month — October 2026

Actual covered hit rate 68.9%

Actual hit rate · 45 covered

Market baseline 76.4% · -7.5 pts

32.6% coverage · 45/138 eligible 1X2 tips

Incomplete market sample: coverage is 60% or less.

Bookmaker Brier 0.2066 (lower is better)

BetLogic Brier unavailable — no canonical decision-time BetLogic probability is stored (P1.2).

ROI unavailable — decision-time decimal odds were not stored for this sample.

Strong evidence

1 October 2026 — 31 October 2026

90-Day Context

Actual covered hit rate 75.0%

Actual hit rate · 120 covered

Market baseline 75.1% · -0.1 pts

32.2% coverage · 120/373 eligible 1X2 tips

Incomplete market sample: coverage is 60% or less.

Bookmaker Brier 0.1734 (lower is better)

BetLogic Brier unavailable — no canonical decision-time BetLogic probability is stored (P1.2).

ROI unavailable — decision-time decimal odds were not stored for this sample.

Strong evidence

13 August 2026 — 10 November 2026

All-Time Context

Actual covered hit rate 75.0%

Actual hit rate · 120 covered

Market baseline 75.1% · -0.1 pts

32.2% coverage · 120/373 eligible 1X2 tips

Incomplete market sample: coverage is 60% or less.

Bookmaker Brier 0.1734 (lower is better)

BetLogic Brier unavailable — no canonical decision-time BetLogic probability is stored (P1.2).

ROI unavailable — decision-time decimal odds were not stored for this sample.

Strong evidence

18 May 2026 — 10 November 2026

Market Performance

Market cohorts with at least 20 settled predictions. Sample size and evidence tier are shown for every row, and no market is ranked as a better or safer choice than another.

October 2026

Market performance — October 2026
MarketLandedMissedVoidSettled sampleActual hit rateMarket baselineDifferenceCovered / eligibleCoverageEvidence
Double Chance9147013868.9%76.4%-7.5 pts45/13832.6% · incompleteStrong evidence

Last 90 days

Market performance — Last 90 days
MarketLandedMissedVoidSettled sampleActual hit rateMarket baselineDifferenceCovered / eligibleCoverageEvidence
Double Chance270103037375.0%75.1%-0.1 pts120/37332.2% · incompleteStrong evidence

All time

Market performance — All time
MarketLandedMissedVoidSettled sampleActual hit rateMarket baselineDifferenceCovered / eligibleCoverageEvidence
Double Chance270103037375.0%75.1%-0.1 pts120/37332.2% · incompleteStrong evidence

Competition Performance

Competition cohorts with at least 20 settled predictions. Competitions below that sample are not compared, because a handful of results cannot describe a pattern.

October 2026

Competition performance — October 2026
CompetitionLandedMissedVoidSettled sampleActual hit rateMarket baselineDifferenceCovered / eligibleCoverageEvidence
Copa del ReySpain1618034———0/340.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Major League SoccerUSA14802255.6%77.0%-21.4 pts9/2240.9% · incompleteBuilding evidence

Last 90 days

Competition performance — Last 90 days
CompetitionLandedMissedVoidSettled sampleActual hit rateMarket baselineDifferenceCovered / eligibleCoverageEvidence
Major League SoccerUSA35904473.7%75.6%-1.9 pts19/4443.2% · incompleteBuilding evidence
FA CupEngland2614040———0/400.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Copa del ReySpain1722039———0/390.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Serie AItaly22803068.8%77.4%-8.6 pts16/3053.3% · incompleteBuilding evidence
La LigaSpain191020100.0%76.1%+23.9 pts8/2040.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Premier LeagueEngland17302071.4%79.2%-7.8 pts7/2035.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Serie ABrazil173020100.0%72.5%+27.5 pts7/2035.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence

All time

Competition performance — All time
CompetitionLandedMissedVoidSettled sampleActual hit rateMarket baselineDifferenceCovered / eligibleCoverageEvidence
Major League SoccerUSA35904473.7%75.6%-1.9 pts19/4443.2% · incompleteBuilding evidence
FA CupEngland2614040———0/400.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Copa del ReySpain1722039———0/390.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Serie AItaly22803068.8%77.4%-8.6 pts16/3053.3% · incompleteBuilding evidence
La LigaSpain191020100.0%76.1%+23.9 pts8/2040.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Premier LeagueEngland17302071.4%79.2%-7.8 pts7/2035.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence
Serie ABrazil173020100.0%72.5%+27.5 pts7/2035.0% · incompleteBuilding evidence

Internal Score Calibration Evidence

This internal learning evidence compares raw score cohorts with their observed outcomes. It remains separate from P1.2's canonical public confidence projection and is not used as a public probability owner.

Internal score calibration evidence by cohort
Internal score cohortSettled sampleLandedMissedObserved hit rateAvg internal scoreCalibration gapAssessment
<60116912578.4%56.5/100+22.0 ptsUnderconfident
60-651991376268.8%62.2/100+6.7 ptsUnderconfident
65-702802107075.0%67.1/100+7.9 ptsUnderconfident
70-7557238718567.7%71.9/100-4.3 ptsOverconfident
75-8041930911073.7%76.9/100-3.2 ptsOverconfident
80-8556742714075.3%82.1/100-6.7 ptsOverconfident
85-903062159170.3%86.7/100-16.5 ptsOverconfident
90+2822374584.0%93.3/100-9.2 ptsOverconfident

Public Calibrated Confidence

The public confidence owner uses only canonical settled Main Tips. It fits monotone broad-band rates with pool-adjacent-violators on the earlier chronological evidence, then checks the final held-out period. Exact confidence is shown only for a band with at least 100 training samples, 50 held-out samples and a held-out gap of 5 percentage points or less. Otherwise public surfaces show a band and historical landed rate, never a raw trust score.

Mapping

p1.2-settled-main-tip-pav-v1

Evidence window

2026-10-27 — 2026-11-10

Settled sample

373

Held-out sample

112

Public calibrated confidence evidence by band
Public bandSettled sampleHistorical landed rateHeld-out sampleHeld-out gapPublic output
Low confidence37372.4%112+3.7 ptsExact calibrated confidence: 71.3%
Moderate confidence0—0—Unavailable
High confidence0—0—Unavailable

Failure Patterns

Missed Main Tips are classified into a fixed, deterministic set of failure categories. Only aggregate counts of losses are published — no individual match, fixture or underlying evidence is exposed, and a win is never counted here even when it was, in hindsight, under-confident.

454 classified missed Main Tips from 1635 settled predictions examined, 13 August 2026 — 10 November 2026.

Classified failure categories
CategoryCountShare of classifiedEvidence
Result went the other way38384.4%Strong evidence
Confidence overestimated4610.1%Building evidence

What the Evidence Supports

Each statement below is generated from the tables above and is only produced when its own cohort reached at least 50 settled predictions.

  • BetLogic Main Tips recorded 65.9% landed outcomes across 138 settled predictions in October 2026 (91 landed, 47 missed, 0 void).
  • BetLogic Main Tips recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled predictions over the last 90 days (270 landed, 103 missed, 0 void).
  • BetLogic Main Tips recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled predictions across the published record to date (270 landed, 103 missed, 0 void).
  • Double Chance markets recorded 65.9% landed outcomes across 138 settled Main Tips in October 2026.
  • Double Chance markets recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled Main Tips over the last 90 days.
  • Double Chance markets recorded 72.4% landed outcomes across 373 settled Main Tips across the published record to date.
  • The 70-75 internal-score cohort was overconfident across 572 settled samples: observed hit rate was 67.7%, compared with an average internal score of 71.9/100.
  • The 80-85 internal-score cohort was overconfident across 567 settled samples: observed hit rate was 75.3%, compared with an average internal score of 82.1/100.
  • The 75-80 internal-score cohort was overconfident across 419 settled samples: observed hit rate was 73.7%, compared with an average internal score of 76.9/100.
  • "Result went the other way" was the most frequently classified error category in this research window, appearing 383 times across 454 classified samples.

Limitations

  • Sample thresholds (20 / 50 / 100 settled) control publication eligibility only. They are conservative product gates and do not claim formal statistical significance.
  • This research is descriptive. It reports what settled results show and does not establish cause or skill.
  • ROI is unavailable because BetLogic did not store verified decision-time decimal odds for this historical sample. It is never reconstructed from implied probability.
  • BetLogic Brier remains unavailable: P1.2 publishes a qualified band-level calibration mapping, not a retrospective per-selection probability scorecard.
  • Void, unresolved and unsupported predictions never enter the hit-rate denominator.
  • Historical performance does not guarantee future results.

Methodology

Research evidence can inform future BetLogic methodology changes, but this report does not claim a public methodology change unless that change is separately documented in the public Prediction Methodology. Internal prediction rules, configuration and reasoning traces are not published.

Underlying Data

Performance, market and competition figures on this page are derived from BetLogic's published settled Main Tip record. The Prediction Dataset contains the machine-readable settled predictions, and Prediction Performance shows the same canonical record as headline windows and breakdowns.

Calibration and failure-pattern research uses deterministic internal learning evidence from settled predictions. Only aggregate, public-safe results are published; internal rules, traces and per-match evidence remain private.